Search: [ Go ]
Thursday, December 4, 2008
  • Homepage
  • International
  • Politics
  • Security
  • Business
  • Editorial
  • Opinion
Opinion: Tariq Ramadan's proposal
By William Fisher
Published: April 26, 2005
TOOLBAR
Print Story
Add Comments
The Muslim scholar who was issued and then denied a visa to teach in the United States because of alleged ties to 'terrorists' is calling for an immediate moratorium on corporal punishments, stoning and the death penalty that Muslim fundamentalists say is mandated by Sharia law.

Writing in the French newspaper Le Monde, Tariq Ramadan said, in Western societies, "the infliction of corporal punishments, stoning, execution in the name of a religious standard that would impose itself on an entire society, cannot be accepted".

The Islamic world, he writes, "sends very contradictory messages: firm and definitive condemnations come from a small minority of Muslim intellectuals or social or political actors, while certain governments attempt to legitimize their Islamic character by the application of these repressive practices".

Calling for a robust debate over "the future of relations between civilizations, religions, and cultures", Ramadan urges "an immediate moratorium in the Muslim world in the very name of Islamic principles
themselves".

"When we call for a moratorium" on the application of Sharia law, he says, "voices in the West assert: 'That's unacceptable; it's not enough!' Others in the Muslim world exclaim: 'It's unacceptable; it's treason to our standards'!"

Ramadan wonders how such a debate is possible given the hardened attitudes of both Islamic and Western societies.

At least one Muslim scholar, Omid Safi, chairman of Islamic Studies at the American Academy of Religion at Colgate University, believes that this kind of debate is "not only possible but essential".

"It's true that this kind of intra-Muslim conversation may be attractive to the West," he said. "But it is not for the benefit of the West that it should happen. It is for the benefit of Islam and for all of us simply as human beings."

Safi is also chairman of the Progressive Muslim Union of North America (PMU), a relatively new, small but growing movement within Islam.

"Our aim has been to envision a socially and politically active Islamic identity that remains committed to ideals of social justice, pluralism and gender equality," says Safi of the movement. "The aim here is not to advocate our own understanding as uniquely 'Islamic' to the exclusion of the past 1,400 years of Islamic thought and practice."

Ramadan voices a similar idea. "The evolution of minds," he says, "will only happen in the Muslim world as a result of this debate, which should allow this universe to reconcile itself with the essence of its message of justice, equality and pluralism rather than to be obsessed with its most repressive and violent aspects because of frustration with bad experiences or feelings of alienation fostered by the leitmotiv of Western domination".

"Isn't it possible," he asks, "to stipulate non-negotiable universal values [the integrity of the human person, equality under the law, rejection of degrading treatment, etc.], while recognizing and acknowledging the diversity and specificity of standards [religious and cultural], the histories that can lead to their expression and demand"?

In August 2004 the US revoked the visa that it issued to Dr. Ramadan to teach Islamic philosophy and ethics at Notre Dame University in Indiana. He had received a visa from the State Department and was scheduled to start his classes in late August. But just days before he was set to travel, his visa was revoked without explanation at the behest of the Department of Homeland Security.

A professor of Islamic studies and philosophy at Fribourg University in Switzerland, Ramadan was barred from entry to the US under a section of the Patriot Act, which denies entry to foreigners who have used a "position of prominence ... to endorse or espouse terrorist activity".

He has been described by Time magazine as one of the 100 most likely innovators of the twenty-first century.

Ramadan is not the first to be denied a visa to the US in recent months. A group of Cuban Grammy nominees was denied US visas and could not attend the award ceremonies in Los Angeles. Dora Maria Tellez, a Nicaraguan historian and former Sandinista official, was excluded because of purported involvement in terrorist acts - even though she had traveled to the US numerous other times. And a group of Chinese computer scientists has met the same fate.

But it is unusual for a visa to be issued and then rescinded, as in Ramadan's case.

Ramadan's position on Sharia law suggests a solution. "The ulemas [scholars trained in Islamic law and theology] agree neither on the interpretations of the contents of the texts that refer to these practices, nor on the prerequisite conditions and the sociopolitical contexts in which they are possible," he says. "In the absence of any consensus on the subject, we must, therefore, open a large and pluralistic debate, by deciding to stop the practices immediately."

He adds, "The application of Sharia is used today by repressive powers that attack women, the poor and their political opposition in a legal near-void in which summary executions of accused persons - whose human dignity is not respected, accused persons without defense, without a lawyer - are
increasing. Contemporary Muslim conscience cannot accept these denials of justice."

"Whole swathes of Muslim populations, from Nigeria to Malaysia, regularly demand the strict application of Sharia and the majority of ulemas limit themselves to asserting that these punishments 'are almost never applicable', by insisting on the prerequisite conditions, but they avoid expressing themselves clearly on the question, most often so as not to lose their credibility with these populations."

"The unilateral condemnations that we hear in the West will not help things evolve. For the moment we're living through exactly the opposite phenomenon: Muslim populations convince themselves of the Islamic character of these practices by virtue of Western rejection. The less Western it is, the more Islamic it is."

He concludes: "We have to emerge from this perversion and Western governments and individuals have a major responsibility to allow the Muslim world to engage in this debate."





To add a comment,
Please log in:

E-mail:
Password:
 remember me
[ Login ]

Forgot your password?

Don't have an account?

Register now to comment on stories and stay up to date on important events and issues in the Middle East with our newsletter.
[ Register Now ]

Advertisement:
MOST POPULAR
  • Egypt Reopens Notorious Extra-Judicial 'GITMO' Camps
  • Indo-Pakistan Tensions: The Path to a Fourth War?
  • Spy Agencies Gather Intel on LeT After Mumbai Attacks
  • Putin-Medvedev-Putin: Middle East Taking Note
  • Mumbai: Islamist Terror's New Modus Operandi
  • Old Lebanese Rival Becomes Syria's New Friend
Advertisement:
Contribute to the Middle East Times | Classifieds | My METimes | Advertise | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Copyright © 2008 News World Communications Inc.