But the same could not be said about his reception in the Middle East where his stopovers, particularly in the Arab world, avoided public audiences, even the media.

In Israel, it was another story for the senator from Illinois who was determined to woo the Israeli people in order to gain the support of the American Jewish community, which seems as divided as some in the Arab-American community about his real intentions vis-a-vis the Palestinian-Israeli conflict.

Speaking before the historic Victory Column in Tiergarten last week, Obama's most attractive observation was about the need to bring down the walls that separate people, as happened in once-divided Berlin. Although he had voted for a border wall between the United States and Mexico to stop illegal immigrants, he underlined that there is danger in allowing new walls "to divide us from one another." He stressed: "The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christians and Muslims and Jews cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."

Obama disappointingly did not mention the "separation" or "apartheid" wall which Israel is building on occupied Palestinian land to divide Israel from the Arab-populated West Bank. (Interestingly, and after a five-year battle, the "Israeli defense establishment" has finally given in by agreeing to dismantle a 2.4 kilometer stretch of the separation wall north of the occupied West Bank village of Qalqilyah. The move will return 2,600 dunams – about three acres – of agricultural land to its Palestinian owners.)

Unlike his Republican opponent, Senator John McCain, Obama did visit with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah – but only for one hour – compared to the eight hours he spent in Israel making the obligatory visits to Yad Vashem museum and Sderot, where he addressed the Israeli press standing in front of a display of shells of rockets fired on this Israeli border town across from the Gaza Strip.

His one-sidedness was admirably pointed out by at least national television stations, NBC and CNN. Obama's lame excuse to NBC's Tom Brokaw: "When you're in a region for a day, you've got a lot of boxes that you've got to check. And in Israel in particular, a big chunk of our day was meeting with not only the current prime minister, but former prime ministers and a whole bunch of people who intend to be prime minister, and it was important for us to make sure that we had covered our bases there."

On the other hand, Obama is definitely an intriguing and well-versed politician. Ali Abunimah, co-founder of The Electronic Intifada and author of, "One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse," wrote recently that since his early political life in Chicago, Obama was "well-informed" about the Middle East and "had expressed nuanced views conveying an understanding that justice and fairness, not blinkered support for Israel, are the keys to peace and the right way to combat terrorism."

Should he make it to the White House next January, Obama, unlike President George W. Bush, who waited seven-and-a-half years to focus on the Arab-Israeli conflict, has promised to "start early," because he correctly realizes the advantages of a settlement. "It will make it easier for Arab states and the [Arab] Gulf states to support us when it comes to issues like Iraq and Afghanistan" – two of his top priorities at present.

Bush, seen as a firm supporter of Israel, received a slap in the face this week when Israel's Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, backed away from any agreement with the Palestinians, as had been the target before the end of the year. He attributed his decision to the presence of an estimated 270,000 Palestinians living in the Holy City, and the two recent incidents in which Palestinians plowed their bulldozers into passing cars.

Be it Obama or McCain in the White House next January, before any direct American involvement in the Palestinian-Israeli negotiations a new team will have to be assigned – a process that might take several months. And then again it will depend on the commitment of these individuals in seeking a fair settlement that is in line with the goals of new resident at the White House, especially if it is Obama who has been advocating "change."

--

George S. Hishmeh is an internationally syndicated columnist.