The start of his trial on October 19 was followed with deep interest across the country, not to mention around the world, though much direct attention has slipped since then even though the trial is historic.
"Saddam is being tried for a minor example of his domestic policies, but he could have been put on trial for much more important acts, such as the war with Iran and his invasion of Kuwait, wars which destroyed two populations," argued Amira Aziz, a 47-year-old Kurd who lives in Baghdad.
Sunni Arab Sarmad Kadar agreed.
"The Dujail case did not deserve such exposure, especially since no witness clearly established SADDAM HUSSEIN'S direct responsibility" in the killing of 148 people from the village following a failed assassination attempt against Saddam in July 1982.
Saddam and seven co-defendants are on trial for crimes against humanity, and face hanging if convicted.
Other charges against the former Iraqi dictator, including the alleged 1988 gassing of Kurds in the Kurdish village of Halabja and the brutal repression of a Shia uprising in 1991 have not yet been filed with the Iraqi High Tribunal.
Some Iraqis, in particular Sunni Arabs like Saddam, sympathise with him.
"This is a farce and personal revenge because among those trying Saddam Hussein, not one comes anywhere near him," said Ahmed Khalaf, who lives in the violent town of Ramadi, capital of the western Al Anbar province.
"There is no reason to judge him for Dujail. Anyone in his place would have done what he did if he had been the target of an assassination attempt," added the 23-year-old.
South of Baghdad in Babylon, Ali Saad, 37, said: "You can't put a head of state in the dock for such a thing."
Others, however, wanted to see the tribunal wind the case up quickly, especially Shias who often fail to see why such a trial should drag on.
"I would like to see Saddam Hussein quickly condemned to death and executed," insisted Naji Katee, 42, a member of Iraq's majority community.
"The Dujail case is nothing compared with the crackdown of the Shia uprising in 1991; it's really a drop in the ocean of terror and hunger that prevailed throughout the country during Saddam's reign."
Among the few Iraqis that agree with how the trial is taking place was Taleb Al Kitan, a southern intellectual who advises the government on legal affairs.
"It's an example for the Arabs," he said, praising the cool head and lighthanded manner of presiding judge Rizkar Armin, a Kurd.
Kitan said the choice of Dujail was justified in that the village lay in central Iraq north of Baghdad and that "among the victims were Shias and Sunni Arabs.
"Saddam Hussein hurt not only Shias and Kurds, but also Sunnis," he said, contradicting an opinion held widely across the country.
© 2005 Agence France-Presse
To add a comment,
Please log in:
Don't have an account?
Register now to comment on stories and stay up to date on important events and issues in the Middle East with our newsletter.